Rugby League has an entrenched, serious, and dare we say it, intractable problem with rampant s-xual abuse and misogyny within its ranks.
This culture is exacerbated and enabled by alcohol and other drug abuse. The latest case involving a very high profile Manly Sea Eagles player who allegedly s-xually assaulted a 17-year-old female while under the influence of alcohol is but one example in the constant litany of assaults and violence propagated by League players. Given the depressing monotony of this abhorrent behaviour, it is time for radical change to be forced upon the “boyz” clubs.
The NRL has attempted to deal with the problems of s-xual abuse and misogyny in its ranks before. To much fanfare and back-slapping the NRL, in 2004, commissioned an academic, Catharine Lumby, to investigate the culture of the league and suggest ways to make players more aware of issues around gender, s-x and behaviour. This project and report, Playing by the Rules, was completed but has never been released by the NRL. The best you or I can read is a summary or fluffy press releases proclaiming its success. I have it on good authority from a source that has read the report that is says nothing we would not expect — the League has a culture of inappropriate attitudes and behaviours towards women.
The question is: why has the NRL not made this report public in its entirety? Why has it not outlined the much vaunted “interventions” and training workshops that it compels players to undertake? Is it because they are evidently not working, given that the abysmal behaviour of players is the same this year as last year, just as it was five, 10 and 30 years ago?
Lumby herself has come out in defence of the NRL and claims that it is society’s fault because violence against women occurs in all areas. Indeed this is true and, as Lumby notes, we must tackle the problem of violence in society at large. However, we cannot overlook the power and influence star athletes have in our society as role models — irrespective of the vexed problem of if they should be role-models or not in the first place.
In the marketed incarnation of sport that we have now, the star player is an icon, and when that icon abuses alcohol and attacks women, that sends a very powerful message of permission — irrespective of the fact that they may be charged, and if warranted, convicted. The cultural behaviours of alcoholism and misogyny are supported and propagated by this, which is why we must hold them to a strict standard of zero tolerance.
A fundamental problem for the NRL is the very lucrative sponsorship and advertising deals that it has with major alcohol brands, not to mention the role licensed social clubs play in supporting teams (through the twin problems of pokies and alcohol sales). The NRL is caught in a bind here — how can it in all conscience tell its players to not consume what the major sponsors spruik? How will these sponsors react to alcohol bans and a concerted effort from the NRL to reduce the culture of drinking? The obvious answer is that the NRL must cut its ties with the alcohol industry, just like it did with the other drug pushers — cigarette companies.
The “bloke” culture of the NRL must be completely broken — both within the organisation and clubs and in the media (yes, Footy Show, that means you). The organisation should begin a concerted campaign to include significant diversity in its coaching and administration ranks — no longer can the old player network stitch up the jobs. The club endorsed activities that encourage poor behaviour, such as boozy lunches, team retreats to Coffs Harbour and debauched celebration rituals, must stop. Any member of the NRL family should be sacked if the break the code of conduct. Lastly, the leadership, both of the NRL and within clubs, must set an example of appropriate behaviour, at all times.
The NRL has three choices: do nothing and disappear under the pressure from Union, Australian Rules and Soccer; have change forced upon them by the outraged public and politicians; or enact radical change themselves.
Obviously, change from within is the best answer — but will the misogynist blokes allow it?
Dr James Connor is a sociologist at the University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy who researches sport and drugs in sport.
There’s a hidden subject in all this – brain injury of the highest performers in a contact sport. How many of these guys are actually punchy? Will they be the next generation of Ali types crippled by chronic brain impairment? Does alcohol and failure of social and allegedly legal standards mask a deeper issue with institutional aggression in sport? Of mental health problems from physical injury?
I bet it does.
I love being lectured by a sociologist,who either does not get out much judging by his comments,given the problems with the treatment of both men and women and grog in the ADF, I do think its a bit rich.
He also does not read newspapers or has ever seen the behaviour at the Summernats in Canberra,or for that matter any Friday or Saturday night in any major city in Australia.
So cut the crap Doc,get real and go clean up your own back yard,I just get tired of these made up know alls who 20 yrs where never heard of before,I have no problem with what the NRL has done,and I think its not before time, all they have to do now having set a precedent is stick to it
The article is re printed in part with the good Doctor’s questionable assertions cahllenged.
“Rugby League has an entrenched, serious, and dare we say it, intractable problem with rampant s-xual abuse and misogyny within its ranks. “
This statement is not supported by any facts. Rampant sexual abuse? – comparative evidence would be handy
“Misogyny ;” Are you serious as a declared sociologist ( a what again? ) to claim by default ALL rugby league officials and players are misogynists?
“This culture is exacerbated and enabled by alcohol and other drug abuse ”
Oh really? – Has the good doctor checked out the behaviour of his own university colleagues and students- just as a comparison. … and the results are? Try comparing their behaviour to wait for it – journalists , oh shock, horror.
.” one but an example in the constant litany of assaults and violence propagated by League players “.. and how many assaults and violence are committed by say politicians, academics just for comparison of the size of the rugby league problem of 400 professional players being referred to as if they are some sort of human left overs.
” Given the depressing monotony of this abhorrent behaviour ” Depressing monotony ? – are you kidding? Which persons are you referring to again- let me see – Wayne Bennett, Scott Prince, John Cartwright, Freddie Fittler, Don Furner, Ivan Henjack, Nathan Hindmarsh – no .. then just exactly who are you categorizing so wantonly and so aggressively without recourse to any facts.
” the League has a culture of inappropriate attitudes and behaviours towards women.” Simply an untrue statement. A non intelligent rant.
“Is it because they are evidently not working, given that the abysmal behaviour of players is the same this year as last year, just as it was five, 10 and 30 years ago? ” Doctor , tell me when did YOU stop beating your wife? Stupid question – just as stupid as your unfounded assertion.
Oh Doctor . Oh – please be helpful not abusive!
The article is re printed in part with the good Doctor’s questionable assertions challenged.
“Rugby League has an entrenched, serious, and dare we say it, intractable problem with rampant s-xual abuse and misogyny within its ranks. “
This statement is not supported by any facts. Rampant sexual abuse? – comparative evidence would be handy
“Misogyny ;” Are you serious as a declared sociologist ( a what again? ) to claim by default ALL rugby league officials and players are misogynists?
“This culture is exacerbated and enabled by alcohol and other drug abuse ”
Oh really? – Has the good doctor checked out the behaviour of his own university colleagues and students- just as a comparison. … and the results are? Try comparing their behaviour to wait for it – journalists , oh shock, horror.
.” one but an example in the constant litany of assaults and violence propagated by League players “.. and how many assaults and violence are committed by say politicians, academics just for comparison of the size of the rugby league problem of 400 professional players being referred to as if they are some sort of human left overs.
” Given the depressing monotony of this abhorrent behaviour ” Depressing monotony ? – are you kidding? Which persons are you referring to again- let me see – Wayne Bennett, Scott Prince, John Cartwright, Freddie Fittler, Don Furner, Ivan Henjack, Nathan Hindmarsh – no .. then just exactly who are you categorizing so wantonly and so aggressively without recourse to any facts.
” the League has a culture of inappropriate attitudes and behaviours towards women.” Simply an untrue statement. A non intelligent rant.
“Is it because they are evidently not working, given that the abysmal behaviour of players is the same this year as last year, just as it was five, 10 and 30 years ago? ” Doctor , tell me when did YOU stop beating your wife? Stupid question – just as stupid as your unfounded assertion.
Oh Doctor . Oh – please be helpful not abusive!