They’ll take their pick and we’ll take their chances. If the politicians of the world felt able to tell us ordinary people the truth they would confess that they really don’t know what is the best thing for their governments to do to get the world out of its current economic mess. For their advice, the politicians rely on those very same finance department economists and central bankers who did not foresee the crisis coming and whose belief in the power of free markets helped create it. With a record like that behind their so-called experts it should be impossible for rulers to be completely confident that this time they are doing the right thing.
Yet act confident the rulers, and the would-be-rulers, do, although that confidence can be about dramatically different policies. At home here in Australia we have a Prime Minister and a Treasurer affirming that without their mini spending stimulus of late last year, and their maxi stimulus that begins this week, the country would be facing economic ruin. Yet just as assertively there is an Opposition Leader proclaiming that tens of billions of dollars are being wasted on unnecessary hand-outs and projects and that any growth in the short term will not be worth the pain to come when the debt must be repaid in years to come.
The story is broadly similar in the United States, where Barack Obama is on a similar stimulus path involving massive spending on infrastructure yet Republicans think that all the country needs is another tax cut, and in Europe where British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is a massive spending man but the French and Germans are still in the wait and see camp as they worry about budget deficits.
How it will all pans out when the leaders of the Group of 20 meet in London early next month is very uncertain. Getting a consensus is clearly going to be difficult And, not being a politician, I am quite able to confess that I have no idea what that consensus should be. But I can see a problem arising if the best solution really is for governments to spend money as quickly as possible to stimulate demand.
Should the Liberal-National opponents of this approach in Australia, and the Republican opponents in the United States, begin to persuade the people that deficits are more dangerous than recessions, governments will perhaps baulk at spending more if it proves that existing spending plans are not enough.
That gives rise to the horrible prospect of the political process managing to create the worst of all worlds — a big deficit and a lengthy recession.
Public service impartiality not dead. A nice reminder yesterday that the notion of an impartial public service is not completely dead. Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Anthony Albanese took the unusual step of mentioning in the House of Representatives the retirement of his departmental secretary Mike Taylor.
The Minister described Mr Taylor as embodying “the finest traditions of the public service”. His view that he “has faithfully served the Minister and Government of the day” was endorsed by the current Leader of the National Party Mark Vaile who was Mr Taylor’s minister before the last election.
Populism rampant. The area of economics where there is the biggest gap between what the theoreticians and the people believe it is in policies of protection. Economic theory might make an impeccable case that international free trade benefits everybody but try telling that to the Sydney Daily Telegraph when it decides to play the populist.
“Nathan Rees has been dubbed the Premier for workers in China after revelations that State Government contracts are sending thousands of NSW jobs overseas,” the paper exclaimed across page one this morning.
In the past year government contracts for making police uniforms have gone to China, while ambulance uniforms have been made there since late 2007.
Cutting another half a per cent? Another interest rate cut of half a percent when the Reserve Bank Board meets on the first Tuesday in April is the favourite way on the Crikey Interest Rate Indicator. The Indicator, based on the market at Betfair, puts the probability of a 0.5% cut at 41%
Queensland Election Indicator. There’s been little change this week in the Crikey Queensland Election Indicator with Labor given a 68% chance of winning to 32% for the Libersal National Party.
A rave review. The old fellow has still got it apparently. I have heard nothing but rave reviews of Midnight Oil’s Canberra concert last night. According to my informants Peter Garrett looked much happier performing for 3000 adoring fans at the Royal Theatre’s bushfire fund raiser than he does when facing the Opposition in the House. The Canberra Times this morning said it all really:
Rave reviews entirely appropriate. The Midnight Oil concert last night was just great. If only the reunion were permanent.
But who was the idiot who decided “comedian” (inverted commas because he wasn’t funny) Clint Paddison was the appropriate support act for such a sublime performance?
Paddison’s website says he provides a “fresh and intelligent” style of stand up comedy with “high-quality, clean humour”. His act wasn’t intelligent or high-quality and if the ‘humour’ was clean then I wonder what he’d do for a dirty act. It didn’t matter that there were many young kids in the audience who had come to witness -for their first and likely last time – the re-grouping of this legendary iconic band. Following a number of non-funny crass jokes, Paddison set up a scene on stage for audience members to try out their Oil band member impersonation skills. Somehow he managed to incorporate a suggestion of paedophilia involving two of them – a female he told us a number of times “loved cock” and a 13-year-old boy. Many in the audience groaned.
Couldn’t the organisers have found a decent local muso or band for the warm-up act? Surely they’d be busting to be on the bill with Midnight Oil.
Those wanting just to enjoy Oils again tonight might consider turning up late and avoiding Paddison. He doesn’t deserve to share the same stage as Midnight Oil.
SHORT MEMORIES was one of the Oils’ iconic songs, way back when. Does Garrett not remember that his failed to gain a Senate seat in the 80s coz Labor preferenced the NASTIONALS rather than the NDP of which he was the #1 candidate?
Just as Labor preferenced Liberals and even weirder no-hopers to block janine hains’ bid for a Reps seat.
Peter, you are nbow simply one on the people against whom we used to warn ourselves.
Shame, SHAM, sick
On Peter Garrett:
damned fool… he should have joined the greens