Laboratory tests have revealed Foster’s super premium $90-a-bottle beer contains brettanomyces, an unwanted yeast characteristic which an expert has described tastes like a “dry stable”.
John Cozens, head brewer at Carlton and United Breweries, confirmed to Crikey that Crown Ambassador Reserve had been found to contain ‘Brett’ — a wild yeast character that produces a sour taste and smell.
“It wasn’t our intention for Brett to feature in the 2010 vintage but we’re still incredibly pleased with the end result,” Cozens told Crikey. “We can’t 100% pinpoint the source of the Brett given some time has passed since we brewed the beer.”
The revelation comes after Crikey reported last month the brewery had been forced to send the top-shelf beer to be tested by microbiologists after an esteemed beer writer wrote that he thought the beer contained the feared yeast strain.
Willie Simpson, a noted beer reviewer, triggered the investigation when he wrote in Epicure he thought the beer contained an “unwanted presence” and he would “send it straight back” had he ordered it at restaurant.
“I reckon it’s chockful with feral yeast flavours and the tell-tale presence of wet horse blanket,” he wrote. “Brettanomyces to be precise, favoured by Belgian lambic beer producers and some English farmhouse cidermakers, but feared by most winemakers and brewers alike.”
Crown Ambassador Reserve, which costs $90 a bottle and is designed to be cellared for up to 10 years, is part of a marketing push by Foster’s to drive interest in its premium Crown Lager brand. Just 7000 bottles have earmarked for release and Foster’s is hoping the beer’s burgeoning reputation amongst fine diners will see it included on wine lists at some of Australia’s big restaurants.
A feature of the 2010 Crown Ambassador vintage is that it was blended with last year’s popular release. Cozens told Crikey it was possible the oak barrels that housed the 2009 reserve brew could have been the brettanomyces culprit. As a result, next year’s edition will not be blended with the 2010 vintage.
Nic Baxter, a lecturer in wine production at the Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE, told Crikey that while brettanomyces was common in wine, it was a real problem for brewers.
“The reason being is that it has a strange taste characteristic,” he said. “In low levels, Americans call it ‘barnyard’, but here we would liken it to the inside of a dry stable. There’s that little edge of horse sh-t, dry straw and maybe a sweaty smell.”
Baxter also told Crikey that brettanomyces was usually only found in Belgian lambic beers and that in the Australian brewing fraternity it would be typically seen as a serious fault.
“Their argument may be that they are trying to create a complex beer, but if that’s the case it’s the first time that Foster’s has done that,” said Baxter. “Typically their style of beer is ultra clean and, I guess I would say, non-descript.”
But John Cozens is adamant the brew will sit well with beer aficionados: “The beer has had so many great reviews and we’ve had terrific feedback from sommeliers, beer writers and the public.”
Funny you should mention this, as I tasted a few Brett beers back to back on Sunday night. American specialty brews, but they had the Brett added intentionally. I don’t mind it, makes a very serious beer though. The sourness can balance okay against good quality malt, but I reckon it would be utterly terrible if the balance was wrong.
To paraphrase Monty Python:
Bishop: It is the dawn of time. This earth we know so well is a smoldering,
inhospitable wilderness. No plants grow. No creature can survive. The hard,
implacable rocks that form our mountain ranges are being crushed and
folded by forces which will take millions of years to shape them. These
are the forces … this is the power … that drives the hand … that
drinks Crown Ambassador Reserve, the MIGHTY LAGER, with the
world’s first great taste of sh*t.
Pass, I think. $90 a bottle for sh*t flavoured beer?
Meski Did the identification of common chemical elements in Malborough Suvignon Blanc and cat urine pass you by, so to speak?
The cellaring for ten years is a marketing gimmick in my opinion. As someone who worked in a brewery for almost ten years, I can tell you that the best beer is fresh beer straight out of the tank just before you put it into a bottle or keg. I’d love to know how they’re going to guarantee the colloidal stability for that long. Any normal beer that got to that age would almost certainly be filled with ropey slime. Maybe someone from CUB can answer that question for me. Most brewers want their beer drank as fresh as possible before the ravages of oxidation spoil and mask all the flavours you actually brewed the beer for. Bizarre.
i agree Greg. i am a avid hobby brewer & i tell anyone who i gift a sample of my bottled beer to keep it in store no longer then 6 months or throw it away. The draft beer i make is promptly connected into my keg system, chilled & drunk as soon as possible. My estimate is after this time my bottled brews would start to taste like sh……Crown Ambassador Reserve