The United States isn’t quite teetering on the edge of the fiscal cliff but it’s currently a whole lot closer than many would be comfortable with after Congress went home for the Christmas break and President Barack Obama flew to Hawaii with no deal.
Under the terms of the debt ceiling agreement thrashed out in August last year, US$109 billion in ‘sequestrations” a year will kick in on January 2, while a round of Dubya-era tax cuts expires on 1 January.
Obama had proposed that the tax cuts be made permanent for those on incomes below $250,000 while the rest expire. House GOP leader and Speaker John Boehner tried to put forward a bill to make permanent tax cuts for those on incomes below $1 million, but such is the intense antipathy toward taxes in the House GOP caucus, where Tea Party sentiment runs strong, that this was rejected by his own party. Boehner withdrew that bill rather than put it to a vote.
Hopes for a “grand bargain” in which spending cuts and limited tax rises would be agreed now appear off the table after negotiations between Obama and Boehner broke down. According to a reconstruction of negotiations by The Wall Street Journal, the re-elected president played hardball with the Republican, conscious that the GOP has managed to identify itself as the party of political dysfunction in the eyes of most voters. Obama knows the Republicans will wear the blame if there’s no deal.
The best hope now is a bill to limit tax rises to incomes above $400,000 or $500,000 and, likely, a delay in the sequestration for further negotiations over a long-term deal on spending. The problem is, if Boehner can’t deliver his party for tax rises for millionaires, delivering it for a lower figure looks problematic. There is also the possibility Republicans may filibuster in the Senate to prevent such a deal.
The talk now is thus what happens when, rather than if, the US goes over the cliff, although a deal in January would avert nearly all of the sequestration impacts.
But even an agreement to simply delay a resolution of the debt ceiling and budget deficit issues may weigh heavily on the US dollar, with flow-on upward pressure on the Australian dollar, and the US stock market, with flow-on effects for local markets (there is also a theory that a successful resolution of the issue, which would be good news for the global economy, would also weigh down safe haven currencies like the US dollar and, perhaps, the Australian dollar).
Ratings agencies may also react adversely, given Standard and Poor’s has already downgraded the US’s credit rating once in response to political deadlock over this issue — although there was no visible impact on the US’s capacity to borrow, which has never been healthier.
As the Republicans’ intransigence demonstrates, there’s no will to compromise despite Obama’s emphatic re-election. Indeed, for many in the GOP, which easily retained the House of Representatives, the anti-tax sentiment is stronger than ever, even despite the notoriously tax-hostile Grover Norquist, in a significant shift, giving the tick to Boehner’s US$1 million plan.
Thus, many Tea Party GOP representatives are now even more extreme than the heart-and-soul of the anti-tax movement.
There’s unlikely to be an outcome from all this that does anything to help Wayne Swan’s faint chances of securing a surplus — another reason why last week’s admission of defeat on that front was necessary for the government. Keep an eye on the issue over the break and into January — it’s likely to have a significant bearing on the progress of the Australian economy through 2013.
Norquist became the Disney version of the sorcerer’s apprentice, having cast the spell over the GOP to never raise a tax, he couldn’t find the correct incantation to turn it off.
Now lots of little brooms are marching them over the cliff. Dum,de dum, de dum de dit-ty dum…
It’s becoming even more perplexing to follow the thought processes of Republicans. Where do they imagine it will all end?
The US is light years removed from the noble sentiment in JFK’s 1961 inaugural address: If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
I think Obama should call the Republicans bluff, tell the American nation in a televised speech that due to Republicans blocking modest tax rises for super rich people (as well as blocking stimulatory tax cuts for the middle and lower classes), the Republicans have caused the nation to go over the fiscal cliff. Blame the Republicans for it. Also tell the nation that for there to be real economic improvement to the economy and services, they need to kick Republicans out of the House to get rid of the policy gridlock.
Zut, I agree with yours and the sentiments of JFK, however, I suppose the uber rich think that they can always relocate with their money while America crashes and burns. They might lose a few of their baubles along the way, like the value of their real estate as well as the existential notion of what they’ve always known as “home”, but them’s the breaks, it would appear for them. This is assuming they think they would ever be affected at all.
I think these people are stupid for thinking this way because the actual losses to them, both financial and psychological, should a catastrophic upheaval result, will be much greater than what they could ever conceptualise. They won’t escape suffering.
President Obama has to win this. Compromise is necessary but he can’t concede too much. If the Republicans are seen to win, his Presidency will be effectively crippled. Nothing that requires the consent of Congress could be done.