Clarification
Crikey writes: Re. “Media Watch watch: Should targets get a right of reply?“. (Friday). Crikey’s reporter described Stuart Littlemore early on as: “a retired journalist who before hosting the show was working as a barrister in Sydney”. This may have given the indication Littlemore was “retired” as a journalist. But Littlemore was nowhere near retirement — he’s still working to this day. In his mid-thirties he took up a law degree while working full-time as a journalist, and once he graduated, he focussed on the law. This didn’t really change while he hosted Media Watch — he kept up his law gig the whole nine years.
On Abbott and the frontbench
Andrew Haughton writes: Re. “After another rotten week for Abbott, change can’t come soon enough“. (Friday). I note that should Tony Abbott be deposed. Then the conservative ministers would prefer Julie Bishop to Malcolm Turnbull as the new leader because she is “more in tune with Conservative values”. What they mean is that Kevin Andrews , George Brandis , Bronwyn Bishop et al have a better chance of keeping their jobs. I don’t know that Julie Bishop would feel favourably disposed to the Attorney General because as his voice in the Lower House, she has been required to carry his steaming chamber pot into Question Time too many times.
The death penalty and Indonesia
Gil May writes: Re. “Indonesia selective on capital punishment (and that’s very bad for Chan and Sukumaran)” (February 24). The death penalty was never meant to be a deterrent. It is to remove those who are of no value to society, who denigrate society by breaching laws committing unacceptable crimes. It cost about $2 million to keep a prisoner in jail for 20 years. Worker’s compensation in no-fault accidental loss of life value that life at about $300,000. Life and every part of your body has a value. Those who oppose the death penalty must be prepared to pay the jail costs, by paying greatly increased tax of 40%. We live in a user pays society — someone has to pay this money and build new jails.
Time and targets
Andre Swenson writes: Re. “Media Watch watch: should targets get the right of reply?” (Friday). There’s also the under resourced rural/ local press for whom Media Watch provides the only critique, as head office cannot be bothered. This includes Fairfax.
Jobs for cadets
Tim Bainbridge writes: Re. “Thanks but no thanks: no ongoing work for Hun cadets” (Thursday). I understood as I believe many people do that NewsPapers are recruiting cadets from creative writing domain as their prime objective is to “create” rather than “report” the news.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.