On Mike Baird’s exit
Martin Butterfield writes: Re. “Baird’s resignation fires starting gun on NSW Liberal factional warfare” (yesterday). Luke Foley’s image isn’t ‘foggy’: it is transparent due to his invisibility. If Baird’s successor was to be selected on the grounds of assistance to the Liberal Party over the past few years Foley should be odds-on.
Wayne Cusick writes: Re. “Mike Baird’s secret privatisation strategy” (yesterday). Selling public utilities that are monopolies is bad. The electricity grid is a monopoly – there isn’t a parallel system which provides competition. There was an article in Crikey in the past few days detailing how energy distribution asset owners are ripping off the community by charging higher prices, particularly in natural gas but also in electricity. It also makes perfect sense to sell off public assets so that the government can invest in building more assets, which will usually be of lower value. And them sell them off so that the government can build an even lower value asset – etc. NOT.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.