UPDATE: Since this story was published a spokesperson from the Future Fund has told Crikey that the fund is seeking to “wind down” its exposure to Russian markets.
“The Future Fund has implemented all sanctions imposed by Australia, the United States and the European Union to date.”
“We have devoted significant resources to compliance and will continue to do so as additional sanctions are announced.”
NSW Treasurer Matt Kean this morning announced the state’s investment fund is set to dump $75 million worth of assets in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. It’s another case of a state government leading from the front, and one that puts more pressure on Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, the Future Fund, to take a similar position.
The Future Fund, which is chaired by Howard-era treasurer Peter Costello, controls around $200 billion in investments made on behalf of the Australian government. And because it is only required to disclose its top 100 listed equity holdings, we don’t know how much money it has invested in Russia.
The fund, and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s office, didn’t respond to questions about its Russian investment by deadline.
Civil society groups are calling for greater transparency, and for the fund to immediately divest any Russian assets. Director of climate and environment at the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility Dan Gocher told Crikey the future fund had to divest given the nature of the conflict and the response from Australia and Western allies.
“I don’t think they’ve got any choice but to divest,” he said.
“As we’ve seen from the announcement from the government this morning, it’s about doing everything possible to isolate the regime.”
The Morrison government announced an escalation of its economic sanctions against Russia today, expanding the list of individuals targeted, and throwing its weight behind international financial pressure placed on Putin.
Gocher said it would be relatively easy for the Future Fund to isolate any Russian holdings, but might struggle to find a buyer as global markets distanced themselves from Russia.
There’s also international precedent for such a move — over the weekend, Norway announced it would drop US$2.8 billion worth of Russian holdings from its sovereign wealth fund.
Rawan Arraf, executive director at the Australian Centre for International Justice, said the Future Fund had to take action in response to the invasion.
“I’d be surprised if they’re not trawling through their investment list at the moment, and I’d hope the Australian government had put out an advisory note to the fund,” she said.
The Russia crisis, and potential divestment, could provide an opportunity for the fund to address what critics say are problems around transparency, and a failure to adequately meet its own environmental, social and governance (ESG) requirements.
Last year documents released under freedom of information (FOI) laws revealed the Future Fund had invested $157 million in companies which had done business with Myanmar’s junta, including a Chinese state-owned weapons manufacturer. The fund divested from that company, the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, but only because of an American sanction which affected its US-based fund manager. More recently, the fund was revealed to have invested $90 million in arms manufacturer Raytheon.
Meanwhile, the Morrison government introduced laws last year which would exempt many of the fund’s activities from FOI laws. They are yet to pass Parliament.
Arraf said the fund was already less transparent than other Western sovereign wealth funds, even without the laws being passed.
“As a sovereign wealth fund from a democratic country, they only disclose their top 100 investments, whereas with countries like New Zealand and Norway, you’re able to go on their website and access entire holdings,” she said.
“The ESG policy is really weak, and, even so, it’s clear they don’t actually follow it.”
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.