data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e32a2/e32a226b755548d1abc090c2b5f30158739598af" alt=""
The focus on the political direction of the Coalition in opposition has centred on whether it would learn the lesson of its defeat and loss of seats to independents and shift in a more moderate direction — a difficult task given its moderate ranks have been severely reduced.
If yesterday is anything to go by, the Coalition is shifting to the right — not only ideologically, but culturally and tactically.
Take the confected outrage around the purported mockery of Queensland LNP member Michelle Landry by the prime minister in question time yesterday.
Whether it began as an effort to distract from the fact that Albanese humiliated Peter Dutton because Dutton didn’t know the basic geography of his own state, or had been planned for a while and was merely dependent on anything that could be made to resemble a provocation, Coalition women manufactured an offence when literally none existed, staged a media event, claimed they were the victims of bullying and demanded an apology.
To call this a stunt — as former Liberal MP Julia Banks, who knows a thing or six about being bullied, did — is to be generous.
At the heart of it is an insistence that something that simply did not happen happened — despite the clear evidence of broadcast proceedings. There’s not even slight room for doubt or uncertainty. It’s the kind of thing Scott Morrison used to routinely do, denying he’d ever said something you could find footage and transcripts of him saying, or insisting Labor had done something that it never had.
And worse is the attempt to co-opt victim status, to seize grievance, to exploit the very real issues of workplace culture, treatment of women in parliament and bullying, for crass political advantage.
Most of the MPs involved in the stunt sat silent while Scott Morrison denounced Christine Holgate in parliament, while he lied to parliament about the investigation of the Brittany Higgins matter, while Morrison’s PMO smeared Higgins’ partner, while a Coalition minister described Higgins as a “lying cow”, while Alan Tudge was allowed to hide out from the 2022 election and then return as a frontbencher, while Morrison declared there was nothing to see here about historical sexual assault allegations against a minister.
To see them parade as outraged victims of bullying now is sickening stuff.
But this is what the hard right is increasingly doing. It is portraying itself as the victim — of persecution by liberal elites, of suppression of free speech, of efforts to undermine their way of life.
Envious of how groups who have traditionally been the victims of real discrimination and persecution have brought that mistreatment to the centre of public debate, the hard right wants a piece of that — awarding itself equal status as another persecuted minority. And it doesn’t need any evidence to back up its performative outrage.
It’s straight from the playbook of a Republican Party that even without Trump has weaponised white grievance and manufactured an entire political narrative out of the myth of persecution.
Peter Dutton confirmed this Republican-like shift in his budget reply. On climate, Dutton is hardening the Coalition’s opposition to real climate action and wants to expand coal and gas.
We need “coal, gas, hydro, hydrogen, nuclear or batteries as an energy source or to store power when renewables aren’t feeding the system. But Labor is going to phase out coal and gas before the new technology has been developed and rolled out,” he claimed. He also accused the government of “ripping up funding” for gas exploration and cancelling gas infrastructure projects, as well as “handing over funding to environmental activists who want to overturn gas project approvals”.
Literally none of these things have happened. The current government is indistinguishable from its predecessor in its enthusiasm for fossil fuels. Like Michelle Landry, Dutton is inventing offence for something that simply didn’t happen.
Dutton’s enthusiasm for nuclear power is like his enthusiasm for carbon capture and storage. It’s the polite form of climate denialism.
It’s no longer quite the done thing to openly reject climate science or claim the whole thing is a hoax if you’re a senior figure in the Coalition. But you can signal that you reject it by talking about the myth of carbon capture, or spruiking the equally mythical “small modular reactors” that are “just around the corner” to provide cheap reliable energy — we just have to keep burning coal and gas while we wait.
If the Coalition is heading in the Republican direction, there are some things that never change in the Liberal Party. Dutton is retaining Scott Morrison’s appalling policy to transfer superannuation from first home buyers to baby boomer homeowners by allowing people to raid their super for first home purchases — undermining industry super funds along the way.
It’s a policy that denies basic economic reality. Like the Coalition denies basic climate science. Like it denies what you can literally see from Question Time. Is this the future of the Coalition — persistent denial of reality?
So many of the women in that photo were complicit in SloMo’s substandard behaviour toward women. It’s beyond the pale for them to now cosplay being victims.
Agreed, not helped by Stan grant who was a dud in q and a on this subject.
Grant was atrocious. Cutting George Megalogenis off when he refused to talk about Albo The Bully & his Broken Promises.
I actually tuned in because I was interested in what George Megalogenis had to say. Stan definitely sidelined him in favour of Jane Hume and Dai Le. Don’t get me started on Stan Grant’s treatment of Katie Gallagher. Stan doesn’t have a sound hosting technique, he constantly interrupts and tends to offer his opinion on any particular conversation instead of letting the panel lead and discuss the topics.
He primary, if not sole, concern in monetising his melanin,
Stan grant is a dud on every subject.
Stan Grant is gigantic windbag.
Indeed. Overinflated by his enormous sense of importance
Empty and loud when expelling.
He is utterly hopeless. He has a wonderfully high opinion of himself.
It reminds me of a a conversation I had with someone who was friends with a person who moved in family circles with Ray Hadley. They told me that after observing him at close range for years that they had come to the conclusion that:
“I have never met a person who has so many opinions about things that he knows nothing about”
(Now I know, a friend of a friend of a…. BUT) what made me believe it was how uncannily accurate it was.
Perhaps Stan fits into this category as well.
There’s a surprise – NOT.
They’re all playing to populism.
It was just pathetic- Michelle Tawdry was the stooge for the stunt. It has failed miserably but what will they try next??
As for Dutton, Just couldn’t watch him!! From what he said in his reply speech the LNP are truly a rabble that have learnt very little! They are just not relevant. How many others switched off???
Talk about Mutton dressed as Landry
More like mutton dressed as scam.
Sexist comment
Dutton is referred to as Mutton and so the comment doesn’t read as sexist to me.
I quite like the Landry dressed up as tawdry.
Responding with a sexist comment is no use.
…coz that’s your job?
So well put. Thank you Bernard!
Unfortunately, also depressing.
Absolutely, agree 100% with this. It is infuriating how Conservative women are prepared to throw away years of work on believing women about bullying and harassment for a cheap, transparent stunt. Once again I wonder how do these people live with themselves and look their children in the eye.
Same again on climate change and energy, perfectly summarised here.
Finally, another giant fail by the old media.
Behaving like this in frint of their own children will be of no concern, as they intend to raise them in the same manner.
Is it possible that Landry was not bothered at all by what happened – she acknowledges she initially laughed about the exchange between Dutton and Albanese – but afterwards she and the other women were bullied by Dutton and his colleagues into putting on their pitiful and unbelievable show of contrived outrage? Given the embarrassment that had been inflicted on Dutton he was no doubt keen to find a distraction and a way to hit back. That would be so ironic.
I am swimming in the same direction as you.
Nothing would surprise me about the LNP in Queensland.
I’ve always truly thought that it takes special person to be a conservative. It takes an amazingly hard heart to see someone who is truly down and out, and suffering, and then lay the boot in (I am serious here, it’s really hard for a normal human to have zero empathy).
If you are capable of this, then sabotaging womens rights or lying for gain comes easy.
Someone elsewhere said dedication to money was more scary than nuclear weapons and I suspect he/she is right.
If Sussan Ley thinks this type of ridiculous stunt will bring women back into the Liberal party fold then she can think again. It will alienate them even more. All they have managed to do is hurt their own credibility.
Yes the stunt merely underlined that women in the conservative parties are largely there as enablers for the misogyny and patriarchy of the men who run those parties. I think any self respect they have would be imaginary.
If these women want to be taken seriously they are going about it the wrong way. The “swinging dicks” will look down on them even more for concocting such an obvious lie. I know I have no time for their nasty games.
” All they have managed to do is hurt their own credibility.”
Gabrielle this is the post-truth Coalition parties in action. However while their continued climate recklessness in promoting fossil fuels and nuclear nonsense is reprehensible and their fakery around these bullying claims a rubbishing of genuine efforts to improve the workplace culture for women it is their continuing support for anti-democratic conservatism such as practised in the US that is of most worrying concern. These people are no friends of democracy without which we are returned to feudalism. They appear to be happy with patriarchal feudalism in their own parties and want to impose it on the whole nation.
Spot on. This sick joke by those’ born to rule’ shows how desperate they are and to what level they will stoop to regain the government benches again. It also shows how important it is to prevent this generation of LNP trash to ever regain power.
But for now back to the ‘leader’ of the opposition and his budget ‘reply’.
Let’s play a game of ‘Pretend”. Let’s pretend that Peter Mutton opps sorry Dutton is a first year university student tasked with writing a reply to Tuesday’s night’s budget – apologies to all first year students for such an odious comparison.
How is one to grade Mutton’s (sorry again) Dutton’s essay? Let’s try:
‘A good superficial coverage of the budget but is lacking any real depth of understanding of the main relevant issues impinging on the budget. Lacks creativity in terms of a grand vision for Australia and largely fails to outline any alternative overarching plan to achieve a better outcome for all Australians’.
‘As you have cleverly worked out being ‘negative, divisive and driven by political imperatives is far easier than producing a solid creative and positive alternative’.
‘Overall a intellectually lazy effort –need to apply yourself to the ‘hard’ task of creative thinking rather than negativity and taking the easy way out’.
Grade: Pass (minus) 9/20 Course: ‘Economics for Dummies’
I doubt I am the only one who outright laughed out loud when he said Aus adults need to be charge!
It is!
Just Dutton’s claim that they balanced the Budget in 2019.
So far the Media hasn’t called him out on that.
How unsurprising,
Frydenberg MYEFO December 2021
Page 337
Table E.4: Australian Government general government sector net debt
2013-14 209,559bn
2014-15 245,817 bn
2015-16 303,467 bn
2016-17 322,320 bn
2017-18 341,961 bn
2018-19 373,566 bn
2019-20 491,217 bn
2020-21 592,221 bn
2021-22 673,387 bn
According to Dutton 373,566bn deficit is a balanced budget – using his premise/standard for a balanced budget – ALP had a balanced budget every year 2007 – 2013
Who wants to be distracted by boring facts !
Aha! Facts! Thank you, Steven.
Net debt does not measure whether a budget is balanced or not. A budget will be in surplus, deficit or balanced according to whether total incoming money exceeds, equals or falls short of expenditure – including payment on debt.
Your figures make the salient point that net debt expanded every year – including the year to 2019 and those figures indicate that net debt increased more than 31 billion during the 2018-19 financial year. The net debt at that time does not equal the deficit for that year. It is the increase in net debt that will be the deficit for that year as borrowings have to be expanded to cover the shortfall between income and expenditure including interest on debt.
I would still like to get my hands on the “Back in the Black” coffee mugs.
They say it all about the delusional Liberal Party.
You need to tell Dutto – not me