Earlier this week we reflected on NAB’s expectation that by the time the Reserve Bank had finished lifting rates, hundreds of thousands of people would have lost their jobs. Then, at 11.30am yesterday, the May jobs report from the Australian Bureau of Statistics emerged to make dills of us all, with a far stronger result than expected.
Employment topped 14 million for the first time ever, and the jobless rate fell to 3.6% from 3.7% in April, when economists claimed to detect signs of a weakening in the jobs market. In all, 465,000 jobs were created in the year to May (though the number of unemployed “only” fell by 55,000 in that time, meaning many of those jobs either went to immigrants or graduating students).
Within minutes, the hawks of the Financial Review were predicting/demanding another rate rise, presumably on the basis that if 12 rate hikes in 13 months, including four by 50 points, hadn’t pushed unemployment up, then by God a few more would do the trick.
But the RBA, which seems bereft of ideas about what to do, knows that going much further with rate rises will send the economy into recession, or even cause a sudden crunch that will exact a terrible toll in terms of jobs, small businesses and borrowers. And it will wear the blame for decades to come.
Perhaps New Zealand offers a glimpse of the future for Australia: its economy has been pushed into a recession by aggressive rate rises by its hardline central bank, but its labour market remains strong, with unemployment at 3.4%. NZ inflation is still running at a headline rate of 6.7%, down from a peak of 7.3%.
That’s a more likely outcome than the US, where the world’s major central bank thinks it has the US economy on track for the much-vaunted “soft landing” (older readers might recall much of the Hawke-Keating cabinet parroting its expectation of a “soft landing” in 1990, ahead of a savage, generation-scarring recession). US headline inflation is now at 4% and producer prices have started falling on a monthly basis. Sometime later this year, consumer inflation could fall to around 3% if oil prices continue to slide like they are doing now.
While the US Federal Reserve prefers another inflation measure (so-called PCE inflation), the 4% headline reading for the May consumer price index (and 5.3% for core CPI) is clearly too high for the bank’s liking. But headline inflation has fallen from 9.1% in June last year, so all those rate rises are clearly working. And the Fed has now lifted its economic forecasts — its GDP forecast for this year has been lifted from an anaemic and near-recessionary 0.4% to 1%. It expects unemployment — 3.7% in May — will rise to just 4.1% this year and 4.5% in 2024 next year.
Here, CPI was 7% in the March quarter with the monthly indicator at 6.8%, including the impact of the restoration of the halving of the fuel excise for six months last year. It was 6.5% without that. Inflation looks to have peaked at 7.8% last year (8.4% for the monthly indicator, in December).
But for inflation hawks, there are still far too many Australians in jobs, so the “rate rise looms” headlines will continue for months yet.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.