A civil fraud trial that could deal a major blow to Donald Trump’s real estate empire has begun, with a New York state lawyer accusing the former president of generating funds by lying and Trump describing the case as a “scam”.
The trial in a downtown Manhattan courtroom concerns accusations by state Attorney-General Letitia James that Trump inflated his assets and his net worth from 2011 to 2021 to obtain favourable bank loans and lower insurance premiums.
James is seeking at least US$250 million (A$390 million) in fines, a permanent ban against Trump and his sons Donald Jr and Eric from running businesses in New York, and a five-year commercial real estate ban against Trump and the Trump Organization.
Trump looked on with his arms crossed as Kevin Wallace, a lawyer in James’ office, called him “materially inaccurate” in describing his finances to banks and insurers: “This isn’t business as usual, and this isn’t how sophisticated parties deal with each other. These are not victimless crimes.”
Christopher Kise, a lawyer for Trump, countered that the financials for Trump and the Trump Organization were entirely legal.
“It is one of the most highly successful brands in the world, and he has made a fortune literally being right about real estate investments,” Kise said. “There was no intent to defraud, there was no illegality, there was no default, there was no breach, there was no reliance from the banks, there were no unjust profits and there were no victims.”
Trump wore a dark blue suit, a brighter blue tie and a US flag pin on his lapel, and told reporters before entering the courtroom that the case was a “scam”, a “sham” and “a continuation of the single greatest witch-hunt of all time”.
“We have a great company. I built a great company. It’s tremendous,” he said. “It’s got some of the greatest real estate assets in the world. And now I have to go in before a rogue judge.”
James said her office was ready to prove its case. Before entering the courtroom she said: “The law is both powerful and fragile. No matter how much money you think you may have, no-one is above the law.”
Trump’s trial is overseen by Justice Arthur Engoron, who will hear evidence without a jury. The case largely concerns penalties that Trump, his adult sons and 10 of his companies must face after Engoron found them liable for fraud last week.
Before opening arguments, Engoron described himself as a generalist on the law: “One thing I know a lot about is the definition of fraud.”
In his September 26 decision, Engoron described in scathing terms how the defendants made up valuations. That included Trump calculating the value of his apartment in Trump Tower as if it were three times its actual size, and listing his Mar-a-Lago estate as being worth up to US$739 million although deed restrictions capped it at US$28 million.
Engoron’s decision also covers several other properties including Trump’s family estate in Westchester County, New York, and various office buildings and golf clubs.
The judge cancelled business certificates for companies controlling pillars of Trump’s empire and said he would appoint receivers to oversee their dissolution. Trump responded to the decision by calling Engoron “deranged”.
Wallace played an excerpt from a deposition where Michael Cohen, who had been Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer but has since turned against his former boss, said the goal was “to attain the number that Mr Trump wanted”.
Kise countered that just because people disagree about valuations does not mean one valuation must be fraudulent. He also said Trump’s banks and insurers knew his valuations were estimates: “They are not designed to be absolutes.”
The trial is scheduled to run until early December. More than 150 people including Cohen could testify, although much of the trial may be a battle of experts opining on financial documents.
Trump has denied all wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty. He holds a commanding lead over rivals for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.
Will Trump somehow manage to return to the White House? Let us know by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.