The big bad wolf at the door of Fairfax is huffing and puffing. But will she blow the house in?
There’s plenty of reasons cited for denying Gina Rinehart access to the boardroom of the beleaguered media enterprise: she’s shown a disregard for journalistic independence (true); she’s too right-wing (allegedly); she enjoys the work of Andrew Bolt (many do); she doesn’t have any media experience (nor does the chairman).
But there’s one really good reason she should be invited in: she couldn’t do any worse.
Rinehart — who Fairfax journalists declare is the world’s richest women — is pretty canny at making a buck. She’s made the single largest investment in a media company from outside the sphere we’ve seen in this country in some time. She owns about 15% of a company worth next to nothing on the stock market. Is there any legitimate justification for denying her a vote?
The multibillionaire might not have any real idea how to save Fairfax. But if she really does blow the house down and launch a takeover the results could be much worse.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.