On marriage equality and discrimination law
Venise Alstergren writes: Re. “Attention religious bakers: you may not discriminate against LGBTI people. It is the law.” (Thursday)
I’m glad to hear your opinion: “As organised religion’s hold on society loosens and personal conviction (faith-based or otherwise) becomes a more powerful force”.
Because it is laughable the taxpayer has to support-as tax free entities-religious organisations. In fact it makes me wonder if they aren’t getting stronger all the time.
On media reform
Jack Robertson writes: Re. “Should you care about media reform?” (Thursday)
Oh, Meeja Reform, Shmeeja Reform. Right now the absurd Rebel Wilson pay-out is a far more salient harbinger of the Fourth’s increasingly crimped future, frankly. It’s a disaster for journalism, both in damages size and ruling basis.
Our defo laws were already the number one news-killer in the joint, but for some tinsel rag to have to hand over nearly $5M for the alleged impact of a bit of vaguely over-massaged but bog-standard showbiz gossip-guff on the “reputation/future earnings” of the kind of C-Lister only too happy to dance the Junk Meeja/celeb fantasy tango when it suits spells catastrophe for serious reporting on serious power.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.